TL;DR
Get business pricing on office and shipping supplies
- Business-only prices and quantity discounts
- Tax-exempt purchasing
- Multiple users, one account, clear invoices
Australia’s securities regulator says it is not currently convinced retail prediction markets are in the public interest. ASIC warns that these contracts can resemble all-or-nothing bets and that Australians using offshore platforms may not have protections under Australian law.
Australia’s Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has warned consumers that prediction-market contracts are highly speculative and said it is “not currently convinced” they are in the public interest for retail clients. The regulator also cautioned that Australians using offshore platforms may have no protections under Australian law, while licensed local providers remain subject to their Australian obligations if they facilitate access.
Prediction markets let users trade contracts whose value depends on the outcome of an event, such as a sporting contest, election, entertainment award or weather event. ASIC says the contracts have “all the features of a bet” and typically involve an all-or-nothing result tied to whether a particular event occurs. That structure can expose retail customers to the loss of their stake if the outcome goes against their position.
The regulator compared these products with binary options, which have been prohibited for retail clients in Australia since 2021. ASIC also flagged possible market-integrity concerns, including the use of confidential information, market manipulation and disagreements over how a contract’s outcome is decided. These are risks identified by the regulator, not evidence that any particular platform has engaged in misconduct.
ASIC’s warning distinguishes between consumers who access offshore markets directly and Australian financial service providers that help customers reach them. The regulator says direct users may lack protections under Australian law. It also says licensed providers’ Australian legal obligations continue to apply when they facilitate access to offshore operators.
Risks for Australian Retail Users
The warning matters because prediction markets can look like a way to trade on current events while carrying risks ASIC says resemble gambling and complex financial products. The all-or-nothing contract structure can make losses abrupt, and disputes about how an event is resolved may leave a user contesting the platform’s decision rather than relying on familiar local protections.
ASIC’s position also signals that access through an offshore service does not necessarily remove regulatory responsibilities for Australian firms involved in the transaction. Providers operating under an Australian licence should not assume that an overseas platform’s role exempts them from local obligations. The source report does not identify specific providers or enforcement action, so the warning should not be read as a finding against any named business.
For consumers, the practical concern is a possible gap between the risks of a contract and the remedies available if something goes wrong. ASIC’s public-interest statement indicates the regulator has reservations about retail access, but does not, by itself, establish that every prediction-market product is illegal in Australia.
Popular right now
Bose QuietComfort Wireless Earbuds with Active Noise Cancellation, Dewdrop Mint
Samsung 75-Inch M80H Series Mini LED 4K Smart TV (2026)
De'Longhi Magnifica XS ECAM22110B Automatic Espresso Machine
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
How ASIC Frames These Contracts
Prediction markets have gained attention as platforms broaden the events on which users can trade. The Finextra report describes activity spanning sports, entertainment, weather and elections, and says the sector has seen a rise in popularity over the previous year. It also cites Kalshi as a prominent example, reporting that the company had more than 30 million accounts created and reached a $40 billion valuation following a $1 billion funding round. Those figures are reported by Finextra and are not measures of Australian consumer use.
The same report notes legal scrutiny of the sector in the United States. It says New York state sued Kalshi in August, seeking more than $36 billion in damages over what the state described as illegal gambling operations involving event outcomes. That is an allegation in litigation, not a court finding, and it is separate from ASIC’s Australian warning.
ASIC’s comparison with binary options is grounded in the contracts’ outcome structure, according to the report. Australia prohibited binary options for retail clients in 2021. The regulator’s current statement expresses concern about prediction markets and retail-client access; the source material does not say ASIC has announced a blanket prohibition on these markets.
““not currently convinced” that prediction markets for retail clients are in the public interest”
— Australian Securities and Investments Commission, as quoted in Finextra
Scope of ASIC’s Warning
The source report does not identify the specific offshore platforms ASIC has in mind, quantify how many Australians use them, or detail any individual consumer losses. It also does not provide the date of ASIC’s statement or explain whether the regulator is considering further guidance, restrictions or enforcement measures.
It remains unclear how ASIC would assess different types of event contracts, including products with varying settlement rules or ways to manage exposure. The warning identifies concerns about manipulation, confidential information and outcome disputes, but the material does not report specific incidents supporting those risks. Nor does it state that all prediction markets are unlawful in Australia.
What Users and Providers Should Watch
Consumers considering offshore prediction markets should take account of ASIC’s warning that Australian legal protections may not apply when they deal directly with an overseas platform. They should also understand the contract’s settlement terms and the possibility of losing the amount committed. ASIC’s warning is not personal financial or legal advice.
Australian licensed providers that facilitate access should continue to meet their obligations under Australian law, as ASIC has emphasized. The source material does not set out a new compliance deadline or announce a specific regulatory action. Further developments would depend on any additional ASIC guidance, statements or enforcement activity; none is specified in the report.
Key Questions
What did ASIC say about prediction markets?
ASIC said it is not currently convinced that prediction markets for retail clients are in the public interest. It described the contracts as highly speculative and warned about possible integrity risks.
Why does ASIC compare prediction markets with betting?
According to ASIC, the contracts have “all the features of a bet” and commonly produce an all-or-nothing outcome based on whether a particular event occurs.
Are prediction markets banned in Australia?
The source report does not say that all prediction markets have been banned. It says binary options have been prohibited for retail clients since 2021 and reports ASIC’s concerns about prediction-market products.
What protections do Australians have on offshore platforms?
ASIC warns that Australians who access offshore markets directly may not have protections under Australian law. The report does not specify which platforms or individual protections are involved.
Do Australian providers have obligations if they offer access to offshore markets?
Yes. ASIC says licensed financial service providers’ Australian obligations continue to apply when they facilitate access to offshore providers.
Source: finextra.com
